Democracy isn’t ready for the AI revolution

LessWrong contributor Sophia Gore argues that the most fundamental threat to democracy from advanced AI isn't deepfakes or social media manipulation—it's how AI could simultaneously concentrate power in the hands of governments and elites while eroding the leverage ordinary citizens have historically held. Gore notes that by twenty nineteen, at least seventy-five countries were already using AI surveillance technologies, with sixty-four employing facial recognition and fifty-two using smart policing systems. Facial-recognition software improved roughly twenty times between twenty fourteen and twenty eighteen, and modern systems can now scan social media for dissent and track protesters by combining datasets with facial recognition at enormous scale. The deeper shift, she argues, involves economic dependence. Historically, democracies depended on citizen leverage through labor and economic participation—workers could strike, withhold cooperation, generate tax revenue. But if advanced AI makes high-value production radically more capital-intensive and concentrated in the hands of those who own the compute and models, governments may eventually have far less economic reason to respond to ordinary workers at all. Gore suggests that unlike the Industrial Revolution, which concentrated workers in cities where coordination and unionization became powerful, an AI-driven economy could systematize the opposite: making capital and computation sufficient, with humans pushed further outside the loop.

Listen to this story

Hear this and more stories in a personalized audio briefing.

Open The Chonkerton