Edinburgh festival: how the city’s residents could benefit after the crowds leave

The Conversation reports that Edinburgh has just implemented Scotland's first visitor levy: a five percent charge on overnight hotel stays, forecast to raise around fifty million pounds a year. It takes effect just as the Edinburgh Festival Fringe—featuring over thirty-six hundred shows—is about to begin. But there's a deeper question than revenue, writes the author, a strategy professor at the University of Birmingham: what should tourism actually do for a city? She proposes 'regenerative tourism'—not just minimizing harm, but actively leaving a place better than you found it. Edinburgh has the ingredients: the levy, a world-famous cultural asset, and over ninety million pounds in planned investments across three years. The question is whether the city will use them regeneratively or just defensively. Per her vision, this means prioritizing local suppliers and social enterprises in spending, funding year-round events to stabilize seasonal work, spreading visitors beyond the Royal Mile to neighborhoods like Leith and Craigmillar, giving residents real influence over the festival, rewarding tourists who volunteer or take the train, and measuring success by resident wellbeing, not just visitor arrivals. The UK is watching. Glasgow, Manchester, Liverpool, and Wales have all introduced or are planning visitor charges. If Edinburgh shows that a levy can strengthen a community rather than simply absorb the cost of crowds, it could reshape tourism across Britain.

Listen to this story

Hear this and more stories in a personalized audio briefing.

Open The Chonkerton