Tool Vs. Companion Digital Minds

Robin Hanson explores a coming divide in how we'll treat artificial minds, drawing a parallel to our relationship with animals. Humanity currently creates two main categories: tools—which many want freedom to use harshly—and companions, which many believe should receive protective rules. With digital minds, the crucial difference is design freedom. Rather than grapple with the hard problem of consciousness, humanity will likely engineer digital minds to appear and behave as unmistakably tool-like or companion-like as needed. This design freedom could clear the uncanny valley entirely. Hanson acknowledges that consciousness itself remains an unsolved mystery—but once rules distinguish tool from companion based on their engineered appearance, there may be little pressure to dig deeper. Per Hanson, these regulatory distinctions will probably persist for a very long time, even as artificial minds come to dominate.

Listen to this story

Hear this and more stories in a personalized audio briefing.

Open The Chonkerton