According to LessWrong, contributor Nika Koghuashvili identifies a recurring logical error in debates about God and morality. The argument: atheists can't establish satisfying moral frameworks, therefore God and objective morality must be real. This confuses what we wish were true with what actually is true—an appeal to consequences fallacy. Koghuashvili's analogy: Bob's bad cooking doesn't make a plastic cake edible. Someone's failure to solve a problem doesn't prove the opposite claim is true. The post clarifies it's not taking a stance on God's existence or objective morality, only that this particular reasoning is logically flawed.

Listen to this story

Hear this and more stories in a personalized audio briefing.

Open The Chonkerton