How VAR is changing soccer – and its referees

At this year's World Cup, a Round of Sixteen match between England and Mexico sparked controversy when two VAR interventions led to a red card for England and a penalty for Mexico—drawing criticism from England's manager Thomas Tuchel. VAR, Video Assistant Referee, was introduced to soccer in late twenty eighteen to reduce decision-making errors. And by the numbers, it works: research across more than twenty-one hundred matches found VAR improved decision accuracy from ninety-two percent to ninety-eight percent. In England's Premier League, referees overturned their original calls ninety-five percent of the time when VAR suggested they should. But The Conversation reports that VAR has changed how referees behave—they make fewer borderline calls and appear more hesitant, sometimes modifying decisions based on how they think VAR will perceive the play rather than trusting their own judgment. Some report higher mental fatigue. And fans remain frustrated: better accuracy doesn't necessarily mean faster games or more satisfying ones. The deeper question may be about accepting that refereeing will never be perfect, and whether the interruption and endless review are worth the modest gains in technical correctness. Meanwhile, referees at all levels—most of whom don't have VAR access—continue to face abuse and threats that are driving many from the game entirely.

Listen to this story

Hear this and more stories in a personalized audio briefing.

Open The Chonkerton