Defining a ‘normal’ country: Japan’s long struggle between pacifism and the threats of a new era

Japan's postwar constitution enshrines one of the world's strictest pacifist principles: Article Nine renounces war and prohibits Japan from maintaining military forces for settling international disputes. Written in nineteen forty-seven, it's been central to Japan's identity for nearly eighty years. But that's changing. As The Conversation reports, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's government has pushed for higher defense spending, looser restrictions on weapons exports, and—most controversially—revision of Article Nine itself. The rationale is rising threats from China and North Korea. When Takaichi visited the White House in March, she told President Trump Japan couldn't send forces to the Strait of Hormuz due to constitutional limits. Her government argues those limits now endanger Japan's security. Public opinion is divided. Thousands have demonstrated against constitutional revision, worried it could make it easier for Japan to join foreign wars. Yet others see the policy shift as necessary adaptation. This tension reflects eight decades of debate—pacifism shaped by war memory, nuclear trauma, and alliance politics. Historically, attempts to revise defense policy sparked massive public backlash. In nineteen fifty-nine to sixty, hundreds of thousands protested a security treaty revision, forcing a prime minister to resign. Takaichi's government faces that same challenge: navigating Japan's deep public attachment to its pacifist tradition.

Listen to this story

Hear this and more stories in a personalized audio briefing.

Open The Chonkerton