The MSO and Lattouf rulings are seemingly at odds. Where does this leave free speech at work?

Australia's Federal Court has rejected a free-speech claim by concert pianist Jayson Gillham, ruling that the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra acted lawfully when it cancelled his performances after he stated on stage that Israel had committed war crimes by targeting journalists in Gaza. The Conversation reports that the court found the orchestra's decision was driven by legitimate business interests—protecting its reputation—rather than suppressing Gillham's political opinions. However, the ruling appears to conflict with a landmark twenty twenty-five decision favoring journalist Antoinette Lattouf, who won her case against the ABC over similar statements about Israel-Gaza. The decision leaves Australian artists uncertain about what political topics remain protected when speaking on stage, and whether the same rules apply to independent contractors versus full-time employees.

Listen to this story

Hear this and more stories in a personalized audio briefing.

Open The Chonkerton