Struggles With Complexity

LessWrong published an exploration of whether complexity is inherently good. The author begins with an intuitive notion—a dog is better than an amoeba because it's more complex—then questions the framework. If complexity is good, what about complex forms of suffering? Using thought experiments involving a mosquito's winding flight and the dimensions of long-term relationships, the analysis refines. Complexity isn't goodness itself, the author argues, but dimensionality—the number of dimensions of experience something engages. A relationship involves emotional and social elements that a brief encounter lacks. The core insight: complexity is neutral. A dog's richer inner life creates capacity for both deeper suffering and greater joy. When managed well—through education and wise choices—complexity becomes a tool for flourishing. That's what makes enabling greater complexity worthwhile despite the novel risks it introduces.

Listen to this story

Hear this and more stories in a personalized audio briefing.

Open The Chonkerton